path: root/security/smack
diff options
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2018-08-01 17:38:54 -0500
committerCasey Schaufler <casey.schaufler@intel.com>2018-09-18 16:28:54 -0700
commitb1fed3edc82ae0d763d5c24769e4a0193da150c9 (patch)
tree2bed92bf641083cbfcbd8eaa1be3ad840bc1ec3b /security/smack
parentdcb569cf6ac99ca899b8109c128b6ae52477a015 (diff)
Smack: Mark expected switch fall-through
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced "No break" with a proper "Fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting to find. Warning level 2 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 Addresses-Coverity-ID: 115051 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'security/smack')
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index 70d3066e69fe..2f5485cbf5ca 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -3474,7 +3474,7 @@ static void smack_d_instantiate(struct dentry *opt_dentry, struct inode *inode)
final = &smack_known_star;
- * No break.
+ * Fall through.
* If a smack value has been set we want to use it,
* but since tmpfs isn't giving us the opportunity