aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/bfs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de>2008-09-13 02:33:12 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2008-09-13 14:41:51 -0700
commit1558182f651798164418abf53f76786da0ea4a6f (patch)
treeff27a7059beb86dd88eb04d8a99f57014f1f78ee /fs/bfs
parentb261dfea48e81636516f4fa653667097638a8a62 (diff)
downloadlinux-1558182f651798164418abf53f76786da0ea4a6f.tar.gz
bfs: fix Lockdep warning
This fixes: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.27-rc5-00283-g70bb089 #68 --------------------------------------------- touch/6855 is trying to acquire lock: (&info->bfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c02262f5>] bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c but task is already holding lock: (&info->bfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c0226c00>] bfs_create+0x45/0x187 other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by touch/6855: #0: (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#5){--..}, at: [<c018ad13>] do_filp_open+0x10b/0x62f #1: (&info->bfs_lock){--..}, at: [<c0226c00>] bfs_create+0x45/0x187 stack backtrace: Pid: 6855, comm: touch Not tainted 2.6.27-rc5-00283-g70bb089 #68 [<c013e769>] validate_chain+0x458/0x9f4 [<c013bece>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xb/0xd [<c013f36b>] __lock_acquire+0x666/0x6e0 [<c013f440>] lock_acquire+0x5b/0x77 [<c02262f5>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c [<c06aab74>] mutex_lock_nested+0xbc/0x234 [<c02262f5>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c [<c02262f5>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c [<c02262f5>] bfs_delete_inode+0x9e/0x18c [<c0226257>] ? bfs_delete_inode+0x0/0x18c [<c01925e1>] generic_delete_inode+0x94/0xfe [<c019265d>] generic_drop_inode+0x12/0x12f [<c0191b7e>] iput+0x4b/0x4e [<c0226d1e>] bfs_create+0x163/0x187 [<c0188b42>] vfs_create+0xa6/0x114 [<c018adb5>] do_filp_open+0x1ad/0x62f [<c0107cdc>] ? native_sched_clock+0x82/0x96 [<c06ac309>] ? _spin_unlock+0x27/0x3c [<c019379e>] ? alloc_fd+0xbf/0xc9 [<c06ae2f4>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x9d/0xab [<c019379e>] ? alloc_fd+0xbf/0xc9 [<c0180391>] do_sys_open+0x42/0xb8 [<c041d564>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0xc/0x10 [<c0180449>] sys_open+0x1e/0x26 [<c01038bd>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 ======================= The problem is that we don't unlock the bfs->lock mutex before calling iput (we do in the other cases). Signed-off-by: Eric Sesterhenn <snakebyte@gmx.de> Cc: Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/bfs')
-rw-r--r--fs/bfs/dir.c2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/bfs/dir.c b/fs/bfs/dir.c
index 87ee5ccee34..ed8feb052df 100644
--- a/fs/bfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/bfs/dir.c
@@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ static int bfs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int mode,
inode->i_ino);
if (err) {
inode_dec_link_count(inode);
- iput(inode);
mutex_unlock(&info->bfs_lock);
+ iput(inode);
return err;
}
mutex_unlock(&info->bfs_lock);