**diff options**

-rw-r--r-- | arch/parisc/Kconfig | 1 | ||||

-rw-r--r-- | arch/parisc/include/asm/hash.h | 146 |

2 files changed, 147 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/arch/parisc/Kconfig b/arch/parisc/Kconfig index dc117385ce2e..cd8778103165 100644 --- a/arch/parisc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/parisc/Kconfig @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ config PARISC select TTY # Needed for pdc_cons.c select HAVE_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL + select HAVE_ARCH_HASH select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK select HAVE_UNSTABLE_SCHED_CLOCK if (SMP || !64BIT) diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/hash.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/hash.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..dbe93311aa26 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/hash.h @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +#ifndef _ASM_HASH_H +#define _ASM_HASH_H + +/* + * HP-PA only implements integer multiply in the FPU. However, for + * integer multiplies by constant, it has a number of shift-and-add + * (but no shift-and-subtract, sigh!) instructions that a compiler + * can synthesize a code sequence with. + * + * Unfortunately, GCC isn't very efficient at using them. For example + * it uses three instructions for "x *= 21" when only two are needed. + * But we can find a sequence manually. + */ + +#define HAVE_ARCH__HASH_32 1 + +/* + * This is a multiply by GOLDEN_RATIO_32 = 0x61C88647 optimized for the + * PA7100 pairing rules. This is an in-order 2-way superscalar processor. + * Only one instruction in a pair may be a shift (by more than 3 bits), + * but other than that, simple ALU ops (including shift-and-add by up + * to 3 bits) may be paired arbitrarily. + * + * PA8xxx processors also dual-issue ALU instructions, although with + * fewer constraints, so this schedule is good for them, too. + * + * This 6-step sequence was found by Yevgen Voronenko's implementation + * of the Hcub algorithm at http://spiral.ece.cmu.edu/mcm/gen.html. + */ +static inline u32 __attribute_const__ __hash_32(u32 x) +{ + u32 a, b, c; + + /* + * Phase 1: Compute a = (x << 19) + x, + * b = (x << 9) + a, c = (x << 23) + b. + */ + a = x << 19; /* Two shifts can't be paired */ + b = x << 9; a += x; + c = x << 23; b += a; + c += b; + /* Phase 2: Return (b<<11) + (c<<6) + (a<<3) - c */ + b <<= 11; + a += c << 3; b -= c; + return (a << 3) + b; +} + +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64 + +#define HAVE_ARCH_HASH_64 1 + +/* + * Finding a good shift-and-add chain for GOLDEN_RATIO_64 is tricky, + * because available software for the purpose chokes on constants this + * large. (It's mostly designed for compiling FIR filter coefficients + * into FPGAs.) + * + * However, Jason Thong pointed out a work-around. The Hcub software + * (http://spiral.ece.cmu.edu/mcm/gen.html) is designed for *multiple* + * constant multiplication, and is good at finding shift-and-add chains + * which share common terms. + * + * Looking at 0x0x61C8864680B583EB in binary: + * 0110000111001000100001100100011010000000101101011000001111101011 + * \______________/ \__________/ \_______/ \________/ + * \____________________________/ \____________________/ + * you can see the non-zero bits are divided into several well-separated + * blocks. Hcub can find algorithms for those terms separately, which + * can then be shifted and added together. + * + * Dividing the input into 2, 3 or 4 blocks, Hcub can find solutions + * with 10, 9 or 8 adds, respectively, making a total of 11 for the + * whole number. + * + * Using just two large blocks, 0xC3910C8D << 31 in the high bits, + * and 0xB583EB in the low bits, produces as good an algorithm as any, + * and with one more small shift than alternatives. + * + * The high bits are a larger number and more work to compute, as well + * as needing one extra cycle to shift left 31 bits before the final + * addition, so they are the critical path for scheduling. The low bits + * can fit into the scheduling slots left over. + */ + + +/* + * This _ASSIGN(dst, src) macro performs "dst = src", but prevents GCC + * from inferring anything about the value assigned to "dest". + * + * This prevents it from mis-optimizing certain sequences. + * In particular, gcc is annoyingly eager to combine consecutive shifts. + * Given "x <<= 19; y += x; z += x << 1;", GCC will turn this into + * "y += x << 19; z += x << 20;" even though the latter sequence needs + * an additional instruction and temporary register. + * + * Because no actual assembly code is generated, this construct is + * usefully portable across all GCC platforms, and so can be test-compiled + * on non-PA systems. + * + * In two places, additional unused input dependencies are added. This + * forces GCC's scheduling so it does not rearrange instructions too much. + * Because the PA-8xxx is out of order, I'm not sure how much this matters, + * but why make it more difficult for the processor than necessary? + */ +#define _ASSIGN(dst, src, ...) asm("" : "=r" (dst) : "0" (src), ##__VA_ARGS__) + +/* + * Multiply by GOLDEN_RATIO_64 = 0x0x61C8864680B583EB using a heavily + * optimized shift-and-add sequence. + * + * Without the final shift, the multiply proper is 19 instructions, + * 10 cycles and uses only 4 temporaries. Whew! + * + * You are not expected to understand this. + */ +static __always_inline u32 __attribute_const__ +hash_64(u64 a, unsigned int bits) +{ + u64 b, c, d; + + /* + * Encourage GCC to move a dynamic shift to %sar early, + * thereby freeing up an additional temporary register. + */ + if (!__builtin_constant_p(bits)) + asm("" : "=q" (bits) : "0" (64 - bits)); + else + bits = 64 - bits; + + _ASSIGN(b, a*5); c = a << 13; + b = (b << 2) + a; _ASSIGN(d, a << 17); + a = b + (a << 1); c += d; + d = a << 10; _ASSIGN(a, a << 19); + d = a - d; _ASSIGN(a, a << 4, "X" (d)); + c += b; a += b; + d -= c; c += a << 1; + a += c << 3; _ASSIGN(b, b << (7+31), "X" (c), "X" (d)); + a <<= 31; b += d; + a += b; + return a >> bits; +} +#undef _ASSIGN /* We're a widely-used header file, so don't litter! */ + +#endif /* BITS_PER_LONG == 64 */ + +#endif /* _ASM_HASH_H */ |