aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>2016-10-18 10:12:27 -0200
committerMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>2016-10-24 08:12:35 -0200
commit8c27ceff3604b249a9efafbd1bd8b141b79e619d (patch)
tree82e4ab0c2825fa25c3168e648268883c0b23ee30 /Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
parent9d85025b0418163fae079c9ba8f8445212de8568 (diff)
download96b-common-8c27ceff3604b249a9efafbd1bd8b141b79e619d.tar.gz
docs: fix locations of several documents that got moved
The previous patch renamed several files that are cross-referenced along the Kernel documentation. Adjust the links to point to the right places. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst14
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index 4cc20b2c6df3..b4cf8f375184 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ can greatly increase the chances of your change being accepted.
This document contains a large number of suggestions in a relatively terse
format. For detailed information on how the kernel development process
works, see :ref:`Documentation/process <development_process_main>`.
-Also, read :ref:`Documentation/SubmitChecklist <submitchecklist>`
+Also, read :ref:`Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst <submitchecklist>`
for a list of items to check before
submitting code. If you are submitting a driver, also read
-:ref:`Documentation/SubmittingDrivers <submittingdrivers>`;
+:ref:`Documentation/process/submitting-drivers.rst <submittingdrivers>`;
for device tree binding patches, read
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt.
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ then only post say 15 or so at a time and wait for review and integration.
Check your patch for basic style violations, details of which can be
found in
-:ref:`Documentation/CodingStyle <codingstyle>`.
+:ref:`Documentation/process/coding-style.rst <codingstyle>`.
Failure to do so simply wastes
the reviewers time and will get your patch rejected, probably
without even being read.
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ toward the stable maintainers by putting a line like this::
into the sign-off area of your patch (note, NOT an email recipient). You
should also read
-:ref:`Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt <stable_kernel_rules>`
+:ref:`Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst <stable_kernel_rules>`
in addition to this file.
Note, however, that some subsystem maintainers want to come to their own
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ decreasing the likelihood of your MIME-attached change being accepted.
Exception: If your mailer is mangling patches then someone may ask
you to re-send them using MIME.
-See :ref:`Documentation/email-clients.txt <email_clients>`
+See :ref:`Documentation/process/email-clients.rst <email_clients>`
for hints about configuring your e-mail client so that it sends your patches
untouched.
@@ -828,8 +828,8 @@ Greg Kroah-Hartman, "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer".
NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!
<https://lkml.org/lkml/2005/7/11/336>
-Kernel Documentation/CodingStyle:
- :ref:`Documentation/CodingStyle <codingstyle>`
+Kernel Documentation/process/coding-style.rst:
+ :ref:`Documentation/process/coding-style.rst <codingstyle>`
Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format:
<http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183>