aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-06-09mm: don't include asm/pgtable.h if linux/mm.h is already includedMike Rapoport
Patch series "mm: consolidate definitions of page table accessors", v2. The low level page table accessors (pXY_index(), pXY_offset()) are duplicated across all architectures and sometimes more than once. For instance, we have 31 definition of pgd_offset() for 25 supported architectures. Most of these definitions are actually identical and typically it boils down to, e.g. static inline unsigned long pmd_index(unsigned long address) { return (address >> PMD_SHIFT) & (PTRS_PER_PMD - 1); } static inline pmd_t *pmd_offset(pud_t *pud, unsigned long address) { return (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud) + pmd_index(address); } These definitions can be shared among 90% of the arches provided XYZ_SHIFT, PTRS_PER_XYZ and xyz_page_vaddr() are defined. For architectures that really need a custom version there is always possibility to override the generic version with the usual ifdefs magic. These patches introduce include/linux/pgtable.h that replaces include/asm-generic/pgtable.h and add the definitions of the page table accessors to the new header. This patch (of 12): The linux/mm.h header includes <asm/pgtable.h> to allow inlining of the functions involving page table manipulations, e.g. pte_alloc() and pmd_alloc(). So, there is no point to explicitly include <asm/pgtable.h> in the files that include <linux/mm.h>. The include statements in such cases are remove with a simple loop: for f in $(git grep -l "include <linux/mm.h>") ; do sed -i -e '/include <asm\/pgtable.h>/ d' $f done Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@intel.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200514170327.31389-1-rppt@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200514170327.31389-2-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09kernel: rename show_stack_loglvl() => show_stack()Dmitry Safonov
Now the last users of show_stack() got converted to use an explicit log level, show_stack_loglvl() can drop it's redundant suffix and become once again well known show_stack(). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-51-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09x86/amd_gart: print stacktrace for a leak with KERN_ERRDmitry Safonov
It's under CONFIG_IOMMU_LEAK option which is enabled by debug config. Likely the backtrace is worth to be seen - so aligning with log level of error message in iommu_full(). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-46-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09xtensa: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-44-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09xtensa: add loglvl to show_trace()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to show_trace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u [rppt@kernel.org: build fix] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200511194534.GA1018386@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-43-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09x86: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-42-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09x86: add missing const qualifiers for log_lvlDmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Keep log_lvl const show_trace_log_lvl() and printk_stack_address() as the new generic show_stack_loglvl() wants to have a proper const qualifier. And gcc rightfully produces warnings in case it's not keept: arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c: In function `show_stack': arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:294:37: warning: passing argument 4 of `show_trace_log_lv ' discards `const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers] 294 | show_trace_log_lvl(task, NULL, sp, loglvl); | ^~~~~~ arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c:163:32: note: expected `char *' but argument is of type `const char *' 163 | unsigned long *stack, char *log_lvl) | ~~~~~~^~~~~~~ [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-41-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09unicore32: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). As a nice side-effect - print backtrace in __die() with the same log level as the rest of function. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-40-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09unicore32: add loglvl to c_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level parameter to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl() [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-39-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09unicore32: remove unused pmode argument in c_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov
The pmode parameter isn't used in assembly - remove it. Second argument will be reused for printk() log level. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-38-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09um: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-37-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09um/sysrq: remove needless variable spDmitry Safonov
`sp' is a needless excercise here. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-36-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09sparc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-35-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09sh: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-34-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09sh: add loglvl to show_trace()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level parameter to show_trace() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-33-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09sh: add loglvl to printk_address()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to printk_address() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). As a good side-effect show_fault_oops() now prints the address with KERN_EMREG as the rest of output, making sure there won't be situation where "PC: " is printed without actual address. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-32-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09sh: remove needless printk()Dmitry Safonov
Currently `data' is always an empty line "". No need for additional printk() call. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-31-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09sh: add loglvl to dump_mem()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to dump_mem() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-30-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09s390: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-29-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09riscv: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-28-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09powerpc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> (powerpc) Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-27-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09parisc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-26-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09openrisc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-25-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09nios2: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-24-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09nds32: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-23-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09mips: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-22-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09microblaze: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-21-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09microblaze: add loglvl to microblaze_unwind()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level parameter to microblaze_unwind() as a preparation to add show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-20-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09microblaze: add loglvl to microblaze_unwind_inner()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to microblaze_unwind_inner() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-19-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09m68k: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-18-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09ia64: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-17-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09ia64: pass log level as arg into ia64_do_show_stack()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to ia64_do_show_stack() as a preparation to introduce show_stack_loglvl(). Also, make ia64_do_show_stack() static as it's not used outside. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-16-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09hexagon: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). As a good side-effect die() now prints the stacktrace with KERN_EMERG aligned with other messages. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-15-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09h8300: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-14-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09csky: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-13-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09c6x: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <jacquiot.aurelien@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-12-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09arm64: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-11-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09arm64: add loglvl to dump_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-10-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09arm: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-9-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09arm: wire up dump_backtrace_{entry,stm}Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Now that c_backtrace() always emits correct loglvl, use it for printing. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-8-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09arm: add loglvl to dump_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to dump_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). As a good side-effect __die() now prints not only "Stack:" header with KERN_EMERG, but the backtrace itself. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-7-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09arm: add loglvl to unwind_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to unwind_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). As a good side-effect arm_syscall() is now printing errors with the same log level as the backtrace. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-6-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09arm/asm: add loglvl to c_backtrace()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Add log level argument to c_backtrace() as a preparation for introducing show_stack_loglvl(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-5-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09arc: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). As a good side-effect header "Stack Trace:" is now printed with the same log level as the rest of backtrace. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-4-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09alpha: add show_stack_loglvl()Dmitry Safonov
Currently, the log-level of show_stack() depends on a platform realization. It creates situations where the headers are printed with lower log level or higher than the stacktrace (depending on a platform or user). Furthermore, it forces the logic decision from user to an architecture side. In result, some users as sysrq/kdb/etc are doing tricks with temporary rising console_loglevel while printing their messages. And in result it not only may print unwanted messages from other CPUs, but also omit printing at all in the unlucky case where the printk() was deferred. Introducing log-level parameter and KERN_UNSUPPRESSED [1] seems an easier approach than introducing more printk buffers. Also, it will consolidate printings with headers. Introduce show_stack_loglvl(), that eventually will substitute show_stack(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190528002412.1625-1-dima@arista.com/T/#u Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-3-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-09kallsyms/printk: add loglvl to print_ip_sym()Dmitry Safonov
Patch series "Add log level to show_stack()", v3. Add log level argument to show_stack(). Done in three stages: 1. Introducing show_stack_loglvl() for every architecture 2. Migrating old users with an explicit log level 3. Renaming show_stack_loglvl() into show_stack() Justification: - It's a design mistake to move a business-logic decision into platform realization detail. - I have currently two patches sets that would benefit from this work: Removing console_loglevel jumps in sysrq driver [1] Hung task warning before panic [2] - suggested by Tetsuo (but he probably didn't realise what it would involve). - While doing (1), (2) the backtraces were adjusted to headers and other messages for each situation - so there won't be a situation when the backtrace is printed, but the headers are missing because they have lesser log level (or the reverse). - As the result in (2) plays with console_loglevel for kdb are removed. The least important for upstream, but maybe still worth to note that every company I've worked in so far had an off-list patch to print backtrace with the needed log level (but only for the architecture they cared about). If you have other ideas how you will benefit from show_stack() with a log level - please, reply to this cover letter. See also discussion on v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20191106083538.z5nlpuf64cigxigh@pathway.suse.cz/ This patch (of 50): print_ip_sym() needs to have a log level parameter to comply with other parts being printed. Otherwise, half of the expected backtrace would be printed and other may be missing with some logging level. The following callee(s) are using now the adjusted log level: - microblaze/unwind: the same level as headers & userspace unwind. Note that pr_debug()'s there are for debugging the unwinder itself. - nds32/traps: symbol addresses are printed with the same log level as backtrace headers. - lockdep: ip for locking issues is printed with the same log level as other part of the warning. - sched: ip where preemption was disabled is printed as error like the rest part of the message. - ftrace: bug reports are now consistent in the log level being used. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Cc: Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@kernel.org> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Chen <deanbo422@gmail.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <jacquiot.aurelien@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com> Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> Cc: Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com> Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se> Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Cc: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@saunalahti.fi> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@pku.edu.cn> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Cc: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200418201944.482088-2-dima@arista.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-08Merge tag 's390-5.8-1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux Pull s390 updates from Vasily Gorbik: - Add support for multi-function devices in pci code. - Enable PF-VF linking for architectures using the pdev->no_vf_scan flag (currently just s390). - Add reipl from NVMe support. - Get rid of critical section cleanup in entry.S. - Refactor PNSO CHSC (perform network subchannel operation) in cio and qeth. - QDIO interrupts and error handling fixes and improvements, more refactoring changes. - Align ioremap() with generic code. - Accept requests without the prefetch bit set in vfio-ccw. - Enable path handling via two new regions in vfio-ccw. - Other small fixes and improvements all over the code. * tag 's390-5.8-1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux: (52 commits) vfio-ccw: make vfio_ccw_regops variables declarations static vfio-ccw: Add trace for CRW event vfio-ccw: Wire up the CRW irq and CRW region vfio-ccw: Introduce a new CRW region vfio-ccw: Refactor IRQ handlers vfio-ccw: Introduce a new schib region vfio-ccw: Refactor the unregister of the async regions vfio-ccw: Register a chp_event callback for vfio-ccw vfio-ccw: Introduce new helper functions to free/destroy regions vfio-ccw: document possible errors vfio-ccw: Enable transparent CCW IPL from DASD s390/pci: Log new handle in clp_disable_fh() s390/cio, s390/qeth: cleanup PNSO CHSC s390/qdio: remove q->first_to_kick s390/qdio: fix up qdio_start_irq() kerneldoc s390: remove critical section cleanup from entry.S s390: add machine check SIGP s390/pci: ioremap() align with generic code s390/ap: introduce new ap function ap_get_qdev() Documentation/s390: Update / remove developerWorks web links ...
2020-06-08Merge tag 'iommu-updates-v5.8' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu Pull iommu updates from Joerg Roedel: "A big part of this is a change in how devices get connected to IOMMUs in the core code. It contains the change from the old add_device() / remove_device() to the new probe_device() / release_device() call-backs. As a result functionality that was previously in the IOMMU drivers has been moved to the IOMMU core code, including IOMMU group allocation for each device. The reason for this change was to get more robust allocation of default domains for the iommu groups. A couple of fixes were necessary after this was merged into the IOMMU tree, but there are no known bugs left. The last fix is applied on-top of the merge commit for the topic branches. Other than that change, we have: - Removal of the driver private domain handling in the Intel VT-d driver. This was fragile code and I am glad it is gone now. - More Intel VT-d updates from Lu Baolu: - Nested Shared Virtual Addressing (SVA) support to the Intel VT-d driver - Replacement of the Intel SVM interfaces to the common IOMMU SVA API - SVA Page Request draining support - ARM-SMMU Updates from Will: - Avoid mapping reserved MMIO space on SMMUv3, so that it can be claimed by the PMU driver - Use xarray to manage ASIDs on SMMUv3 - Reword confusing shutdown message - DT compatible string updates - Allow implementations to override the default domain type - A new IOMMU driver for the Allwinner Sun50i platform - Support for ATS gets disabled for untrusted devices (like Thunderbolt devices). This includes a PCI patch, acked by Bjorn. - Some cleanups to the AMD IOMMU driver to make more use of IOMMU core features. - Unification of some printk formats in the Intel and AMD IOMMU drivers and in the IOVA code. - Updates for DT bindings - A number of smaller fixes and cleanups. * tag 'iommu-updates-v5.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joro/iommu: (109 commits) iommu: Check for deferred attach in iommu_group_do_dma_attach() iommu/amd: Remove redundant devid checks iommu/amd: Store dev_data as device iommu private data iommu/amd: Merge private header files iommu/amd: Remove PD_DMA_OPS_MASK iommu/amd: Consolidate domain allocation/freeing iommu/amd: Free page-table in protection_domain_free() iommu/amd: Allocate page-table in protection_domain_init() iommu/amd: Let free_pagetable() not rely on domain->pt_root iommu/amd: Unexport get_dev_data() iommu/vt-d: Fix compile warning iommu/vt-d: Remove real DMA lookup in find_domain iommu/vt-d: Allocate domain info for real DMA sub-devices iommu/vt-d: Only clear real DMA device's context entries iommu: Remove iommu_sva_ops::mm_exit() uacce: Remove mm_exit() op iommu/sun50i: Constify sun50i_iommu_ops iommu/hyper-v: Constify hyperv_ir_domain_ops iommu/vt-d: Use pci_ats_supported() iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use pci_ats_supported() ...
2020-06-08Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)Linus Torvalds
Merge still more updates from Andrew Morton: "Various trees. Mainly those parts of MM whose linux-next dependents are now merged. I'm still sitting on ~160 patches which await merges from -next. Subsystems affected by this patch series: mm/proc, ipc, dynamic-debug, panic, lib, sysctl, mm/gup, mm/pagemap" * emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>: (52 commits) doc: cgroup: update note about conditions when oom killer is invoked module: move the set_fs hack for flush_icache_range to m68k nommu: use flush_icache_user_range in brk and mmap binfmt_flat: use flush_icache_user_range exec: use flush_icache_user_range in read_code exec: only build read_code when needed m68k: implement flush_icache_user_range arm: rename flush_cache_user_range to flush_icache_user_range xtensa: implement flush_icache_user_range sh: implement flush_icache_user_range asm-generic: add a flush_icache_user_range stub mm: rename flush_icache_user_range to flush_icache_user_page arm,sparc,unicore32: remove flush_icache_user_range riscv: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h powerpc: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h openrisc: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h m68knommu: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h microblaze: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h ia64: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h hexagon: use asm-generic/cacheflush.h ...
2020-06-08module: move the set_fs hack for flush_icache_range to m68kChristoph Hellwig
flush_icache_range generally operates on kernel addresses, but for some reason m68k needed a set_fs override. Move that into the m68k code insted of keeping it in the module loader. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200515143646.3857579-30-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>