aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/net/sched/cls_route.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2017-10-29 22:49:32 +0900
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2017-10-29 22:49:32 +0900
commit6c325f4eca9ee9eb32cf58768e6e4ebcabaa8d6e (patch)
tree9977e690a21f354b5ed0535f8ddad4ec176f6dac /net/sched/cls_route.c
parent8c83c88584abb3a04a4026be91060bc309f4c034 (diff)
parent31c2611b66e01378b54f7ef641cb0d23fcd8502f (diff)
downloadlinux-stericsson-6c325f4eca9ee9eb32cf58768e6e4ebcabaa8d6e.tar.gz
Merge branch 'net_sched-fix-races-with-RCU-callbacks'
Cong Wang says: ==================== net_sched: fix races with RCU callbacks Recently, the RCU callbacks used in TC filters and TC actions keep drawing my attention, they introduce at least 4 race condition bugs: 1. A simple one fixed by Daniel: commit c78e1746d3ad7d548bdf3fe491898cc453911a49 Author: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Date: Wed May 20 17:13:33 2015 +0200 net: sched: fix call_rcu() race on classifier module unloads 2. A very nasty one fixed by me: commit 1697c4bb5245649a23f06a144cc38c06715e1b65 Author: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Date: Mon Sep 11 16:33:32 2017 -0700 net_sched: carefully handle tcf_block_put() 3. Two more bugs found by Chris: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/826696/ https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/826695/ Usually RCU callbacks are simple, however for TC filters and actions, they are complex because at least TC actions could be destroyed together with the TC filter in one callback. And RCU callbacks are invoked in BH context, without locking they are parallel too. All of these contribute to the cause of these nasty bugs. Alternatively, we could also: a) Introduce a spinlock to serialize these RCU callbacks. But as I said in commit 1697c4bb5245 ("net_sched: carefully handle tcf_block_put()"), it is very hard to do because of tcf_chain_dump(). Potentially we need to do a lot of work to make it possible (if not impossible). b) Just get rid of these RCU callbacks, because they are not necessary at all, callers of these call_rcu() are all on slow paths and holding RTNL lock, so blocking is allowed in their contexts. However, David and Eric dislike adding synchronize_rcu() here. As suggested by Paul, we could defer the work to a workqueue and gain the permission of holding RTNL again without any performance impact, however, in tcf_block_put() we could have a deadlock when flushing workqueue while hodling RTNL lock, the trick here is to defer the work itself in workqueue and make it queued after all other works so that we keep the same ordering to avoid any use-after-free. Please see the first patch for details. Patch 1 introduces the infrastructure, patch 2~12 move each tc filter to the new tc filter workqueue, patch 13 adds an assertion to catch potential bugs like this, patch 14 closes another rcu callback race, patch 15 and patch 16 add new test cases. ==================== Reported-by: Chris Mi <chrism@mellanox.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sched/cls_route.c')
-rw-r--r--net/sched/cls_route.c19
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_route.c b/net/sched/cls_route.c
index 9ddde65915d2..4b14ccd8b8f2 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_route.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_route.c
@@ -57,7 +57,10 @@ struct route4_filter {
u32 handle;
struct route4_bucket *bkt;
struct tcf_proto *tp;
- struct rcu_head rcu;
+ union {
+ struct work_struct work;
+ struct rcu_head rcu;
+ };
};
#define ROUTE4_FAILURE ((struct route4_filter *)(-1L))
@@ -254,12 +257,22 @@ static int route4_init(struct tcf_proto *tp)
return 0;
}
-static void route4_delete_filter(struct rcu_head *head)
+static void route4_delete_filter_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
- struct route4_filter *f = container_of(head, struct route4_filter, rcu);
+ struct route4_filter *f = container_of(work, struct route4_filter, work);
+ rtnl_lock();
tcf_exts_destroy(&f->exts);
kfree(f);
+ rtnl_unlock();
+}
+
+static void route4_delete_filter(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+ struct route4_filter *f = container_of(head, struct route4_filter, rcu);
+
+ INIT_WORK(&f->work, route4_delete_filter_work);
+ tcf_queue_work(&f->work);
}
static void route4_destroy(struct tcf_proto *tp)