aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>2019-07-18 08:15:10 +0000
committerMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>2019-07-23 09:23:44 +0100
commitbca031e2c8aa22a978a2452bf959e27e9fa73dc7 (patch)
treec7e80e707e3abc3d924254432f4159b36b51631f
parent5f9e832c137075045d15cd6899ab0505cfb2ca4b (diff)
downloadlinux-stericsson-bca031e2c8aa22a978a2452bf959e27e9fa73dc7.tar.gz
KVM: arm/arm64: Introduce kvm_pmu_vcpu_init() to setup PMU counter index
We use "pmc->idx" and the "chained" bitmap to determine if the pmc is chained, in kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(). But idx might be uninitialized (and random) when we doing this decision, through a KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT ioctl -> kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(). And the test_bit() against this random idx will potentially hit a KASAN BUG [1]. In general, idx is the static property of a PMU counter that is not expected to be modified across resets, as suggested by Julien. It looks more reasonable if we can setup the PMU counter idx for a vcpu in its creation time. Introduce a new function - kvm_pmu_vcpu_init() for this basic setup. Oh, and the KASAN BUG will get fixed this way. [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg36700.html Fixes: 80f393a23be6 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Support chained PMU counters") Suggested-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com> Suggested-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Acked-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
-rw-r--r--include/kvm/arm_pmu.h2
-rw-r--r--virt/kvm/arm/arm.c2
-rw-r--r--virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c18
3 files changed, 19 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
index 16c769a7f979..6db030439e29 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val);
u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+void kvm_pmu_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
void kvm_pmu_disable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
@@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ static inline u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
return 0;
}
+static inline void kvm_pmu_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
static inline void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
static inline void kvm_pmu_vcpu_destroy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
static inline void kvm_pmu_disable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index f645c0fbf7ec..c704fa696184 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -340,6 +340,8 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* Set up the timer */
kvm_timer_vcpu_init(vcpu);
+ kvm_pmu_vcpu_init(vcpu);
+
kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(vcpu);
return kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(vcpu);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
index 3dd8238ed246..362a01886bab 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
@@ -215,6 +215,20 @@ static void kvm_pmu_stop_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
}
/**
+ * kvm_pmu_vcpu_init - assign pmu counter idx for cpu
+ * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
+ *
+ */
+void kvm_pmu_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ int i;
+ struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
+ pmu->pmc[i].idx = i;
+}
+
+/**
* kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset - reset pmu state for cpu
* @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
*
@@ -224,10 +238,8 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
int i;
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
- for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++)
kvm_pmu_stop_counter(vcpu, &pmu->pmc[i]);
- pmu->pmc[i].idx = i;
- }
bitmap_zero(vcpu->arch.pmu.chained, ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS);
}