|author||Pavel Machek <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2006-09-29 02:01:29 -0700|
|committer||Linus Torvalds <email@example.com>||2006-09-29 09:18:23 -0700|
[PATCH] SubmittingPatches cleanups
This cleans up SubmittingPatches a bit. Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <firstname.lastname@example.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <email@example.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/SubmittingPatches')
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index d42ab4c9e89..958182f6aa1 100644
@@ -173,15 +173,15 @@ For small patches you may want to CC the Trivial Patch Monkey
email@example.com managed by Adrian Bunk; which collects "trivial"
patches. Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following rules:
Spelling fixes in documentation
- Spelling fixes which could break grep(1).
+ Spelling fixes which could break grep(1)
Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad)
Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct)
Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things)
- Removing use of deprecated functions/macros (eg. check_region).
+ Removing use of deprecated functions/macros (eg. check_region)
Contact detail and documentation fixes
Non-portable code replaced by portable code (even in arch-specific,
since people copy, as long as it's trivial)
- Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file. (ie. patch monkey
+ Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file (ie. patch monkey
in re-transmission mode)
@@ -245,13 +245,13 @@ updated change.
It is quite common for Linus to "drop" your patch without comment.
That's the nature of the system. If he drops your patch, it could be
-* Your patch did not apply cleanly to the latest kernel version
+* Your patch did not apply cleanly to the latest kernel version.
* Your patch was not sufficiently discussed on linux-kernel.
-* A style issue (see section 2),
-* An e-mail formatting issue (re-read this section)
-* A technical problem with your change
-* He gets tons of e-mail, and yours got lost in the shuffle
-* You are being annoying (See Figure 1)
+* A style issue (see section 2).
+* An e-mail formatting issue (re-read this section).
+* A technical problem with your change.
+* He gets tons of e-mail, and yours got lost in the shuffle.
+* You are being annoying.
When in doubt, solicit comments on linux-kernel mailing list.
@@ -476,10 +476,10 @@ SECTION 3 - REFERENCES
Andrew Morton, "The perfect patch" (tpp).
-Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submission format."
+Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submission format".
-Greg Kroah-Hartman "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer".
+Greg Kroah-Hartman, "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer".
@@ -488,9 +488,9 @@ Greg Kroah-Hartman "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer".
NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to firstname.lastname@example.org people!
-Linus Torvald's mail on the canonical patch format:
+Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format: