aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/seccomp.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>2017-08-02 15:00:40 -0700
committerKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>2017-08-14 13:46:42 -0700
commitdeb4de8b31bc5bf21efb6ac31150a01a631cd647 (patch)
tree71ba73a95233cd80446c01105e5242598d22feb2 /kernel/seccomp.c
parentf3f6e30669c048f47d51ea59df9946a91f551c4c (diff)
downloadlinux-stericsson-deb4de8b31bc5bf21efb6ac31150a01a631cd647.tar.gz
seccomp: Provide matching filter for introspection
Both the upcoming logging improvements and changes to RET_KILL will need to know which filter a given seccomp return value originated from. In order to delay logic processing of result until after the seccomp loop, this adds a single pointer assignment on matches. This will allow both log and RET_KILL logic to work off the filter rather than doing more expensive tests inside the time-critical run_filters loop. Running tight cycles of getpid() with filters attached shows no measurable difference in speed. Suggested-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/seccomp.c')
-rw-r--r--kernel/seccomp.c18
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
index 98b59b5db90b..1f3347fc2605 100644
--- a/kernel/seccomp.c
+++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
@@ -171,10 +171,14 @@ static int seccomp_check_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen)
/**
* seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
* @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
+ * @match: stores struct seccomp_filter that resulted in the return value,
+ * unless filter returned SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, in which case it will
+ * be unchanged.
*
* Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
*/
-static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd)
+static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
+ struct seccomp_filter **match)
{
struct seccomp_data sd_local;
u32 ret = SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW;
@@ -198,8 +202,10 @@ static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd)
for (; f; f = f->prev) {
u32 cur_ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(f->prog, sd);
- if ((cur_ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION) < (ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION))
+ if ((cur_ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION) < (ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION)) {
ret = cur_ret;
+ *match = f;
+ }
}
return ret;
}
@@ -566,6 +572,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
const bool recheck_after_trace)
{
u32 filter_ret, action;
+ struct seccomp_filter *match = NULL;
int data;
/*
@@ -574,7 +581,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
*/
rmb();
- filter_ret = seccomp_run_filters(sd);
+ filter_ret = seccomp_run_filters(sd, &match);
data = filter_ret & SECCOMP_RET_DATA;
action = filter_ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION;
@@ -638,6 +645,11 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
return 0;
case SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW:
+ /*
+ * Note that the "match" filter will always be NULL for
+ * this action since SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW is the starting
+ * state in seccomp_run_filters().
+ */
return 0;
case SECCOMP_RET_KILL: