aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-05-30cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq:- Handle return value of clk_prepare_enable()Arvind Yadav
clk_prepare_enable() can fail here and we must check its return value. Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-26cpufreq: kirkwood: add missing \n to end of dev_err messagesColin Ian King
Trival fix, dev_err messages are missing a \n, so add it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-10-20cpufreq: drop owner assignment from platform_driversWolfram Sang
A platform_driver does not need to set an owner, it will be populated by the driver core. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
2014-09-02cpufreq: kirkwood: use the powersave multiplexerMike Turquette
The powersave clock acts like a multiplexer for the cpu, selecting either the clock signal derived from the cpu pll or from the ddr clock. This patch changes powersave from a gate clock to a mux clock to better reflect this behavior. This is a cleaner approach whereby the frequency of the cpu always matches the rate of powersave_clk. The cpufreq driver for the kirkwood platform no longer must parse this behavior out of various calls to clk_enable and clk_disable, but can instead simply select the parent cpu it wants when changing rate. Likewise when requesting the cpu rate we need only query powersave_clk's rate through the usual call to clk_get_rate. The new clock data and corresponding changes to the cpufreq driver are combined into this single commit to avoid a git bisect issue where this cpufreq driver fails to work properly between the commit that updates the kirkwood clock driver and the commit that changes how the cpufreq driver uses that clock. Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
2014-04-07cpufreq: create another field .flags in cpufreq_frequency_tableViresh Kumar
Currently cpufreq frequency table has two fields: frequency and driver_data. driver_data is only for drivers' internal use and cpufreq core shouldn't use it at all. But with the introduction of BOOST frequencies, this assumption was broken and we started using it as a flag instead. There are two problems due to this: - It is against the description of this field, as driver's data is used by the core now. - if drivers fill it with -3 for any frequency, then those frequencies are never considered by cpufreq core as it is exactly same as value of CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ, i.e. ~2. The best way to get this fixed is by creating another field flags which will be used for such flags. This patch does that. Along with that various drivers need modifications due to the change of struct cpufreq_frequency_table. Reviewed-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-03-12cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_generic_exit()Viresh Kumar
cpufreq_generic_exit() is empty now and can be deleted. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2014-01-06cpufreq: Mark ARM drivers with CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK flagViresh Kumar
Sometimes boot loaders set CPU frequency to a value outside of frequency table present with cpufreq core. In such cases CPU might be unstable if it has to run on that frequency for long duration of time and so its better to set it to a frequency which is specified in frequency table. On some systems we can't really say what frequency we're running at the moment and so for these we shouldn't check if we are running at a frequency present in frequency table. And so we really can't force this for all the cpufreq drivers. Hence we are created another flag here: CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK that will be marked by platforms which want to go for this check at boot time. Initially this is done for all ARM platforms but others may follow if required. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-31cpufreq: move freq change notifications to cpufreq coreViresh Kumar
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines: struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; freqs.old = old freq... freqs.new = new freq... cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE); /* Change rate here */ cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE); This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead. There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for doing this work, work/tasklet/etc.. They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag: CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them. All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as double notification would happen otherwise. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-25cpufreq: Implement light weight ->target_index() routineViresh Kumar
Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is: int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation); And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they don't use target_freq and relation after that. So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers are converted to expose frequency tables. This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine. It looks like this: int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index); CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time. This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly. It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight .target_index() routine for many driver. Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
2013-10-16cpufreq: kirkwood: use cpufreq_generic_init()Viresh Kumar
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code here. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16cpufreq: kirkwood: don't initialize part of policy set by coreViresh Kumar
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code. Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling ->init(). Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-10-16cpufreq: kirkwood: Use generic cpufreq routinesViresh Kumar
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used by cpufreq drivers then. This patch uses these generic routines in the kirkwood driver. Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-09-30cpufreq: kirkwood: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()Viresh Kumar
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-08-23Merge branch 'cpu_of_node' of git://linux-arm.org/linux-skn into pm-cpufreq-nextRafael J. Wysocki
Pull DT/core/cpufreq cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12 from Sudeep KarkadaNagesha. * 'cpu_of_node' of git://linux-arm.org/linux-skn: cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes cpufreq: pmac64-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes cpufreq: maple-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes cpufreq: arm_big_little: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity of/device: add helper to get cpu device node from logical cpu index driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_match_cpu_phys_id of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures openrisc: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration microblaze: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration
2013-08-21cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodesSudeep KarkadaNagesha
Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available) appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant. This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead. Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
2013-08-10cpufreq: Drop the owner field from struct cpufreq_driverViresh Kumar
We don't need to set .owner = THIS_MODULE any more in cpufreq drivers as this field isn't used any more by the cpufreq core. This patch removes it and updates all dependent drivers accordingly. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-06-04cpufreq: rename index as driver_data in cpufreq_frequency_tableViresh Kumar
The "index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never an index and isn't used at all by the cpufreq core. It only is useful for cpufreq drivers for their internal purposes. Many people nowadays blindly set it in ascending order with the assumption that the core will use it, which is a mistake. Rename it to "driver_data" as that's what its purpose is. All of its users are updated accordingly. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-12cpufreq / kirkwood: don't check resource with devm_ioremap_resourceWolfram Sang
devm_ioremap_resource does sanity checks on the given resource. No need to duplicate this in the driver. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-04-02cpufreq: Notify all policy->cpus in cpufreq_notify_transition()Viresh Kumar
policy->cpus contains all online cpus that have single shared clock line. And their frequencies are always updated together. Many SMP system's cpufreq drivers take care of this in individual drivers but the best place for this code is in cpufreq core. This patch modifies cpufreq_notify_transition() to notify frequency change for all cpus in policy->cpus and hence updates all users of this API. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-04-01cpufreq: kirkwood: fix coccicheck warningsSilviu-Mihai Popescu
Convert all uses of devm_request_and_ioremap() to the newly introduced devm_ioremap_resource() which provides more consistent error handling. devm_ioremap_resource() provides its own error messages so all explicit error messages can be removed from the failure code paths. Signed-off-by: Silviu-Mihai Popescu <silviupopescu1990@gmail.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-02-09cpufreq: kirkwood: Add a cpufreq driver for Marvell Kirkwood SoCsAndrew Lunn
The Marvell Kirkwood SoCs have simple cpufreq support in hardware. The CPU can either use the a high speed cpu clock, or the slower DDR clock. Add a driver to swap between these two clock sources. Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>