aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>2015-12-21 18:17:10 +0100
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>2016-01-06 11:01:07 +0100
commit093e5840ae76f1082633503964d035f40ed0216d (patch)
tree81af673ff32ea6a7b1220e3c1c8f96e9ebb6a856
parentbe958bdc96f18bc1356177bbb79d46ea0c037b96 (diff)
downloadleg-kernel-093e5840ae76f1082633503964d035f40ed0216d.tar.gz
sched/core: Reset task's lockless wake-queues on fork()
In the following commit: 7675104990ed ("sched: Implement lockless wake-queues") we gained lockless wake-queues. The -RT kernel managed to lockup itself with those. There could be multiple attempts for task X to enqueue it for a wakeup _even_ if task X is already running. The reason is that task X could be runnable but not yet on CPU. The the task performing the wakeup did not leave the CPU it could performe multiple wakeups. With the proper timming task X could be running and enqueued for a wakeup. If this happens while X is performing a fork() then its its child will have a !NULL `wake_q` member copied. This is not a problem as long as the child task does not participate in lockless wakeups :) Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 7675104990ed ("sched: Implement lockless wake-queues") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151221171710.GA5499@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--kernel/fork.c1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index fce002ee3ddf..1155eac61687 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -380,6 +380,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig)
#endif
tsk->splice_pipe = NULL;
tsk->task_frag.page = NULL;
+ tsk->wake_q.next = NULL;
account_kernel_stack(ti, 1);